Contrasting Normative Arguments in Standard FormScenario: In this assignment, you will make two contrasting normative arguments about what one ought to do. Both

Attached is the lecture  attached are 2 questions that require answered.

do this assignment for me ,its for my philosophy ethics class 

Write and post a 400-500 word focused argument about the reading. You should establish your point from the beginning (i.e., in the first sentence) and support your claims with textual evidence. Your post can: Draw a comparison between something in the text to something today by arguing that the element in the

Please watch the videos first, then complete the Data, Calculations, and Construction of Orbit sections before answering the six questions and writing the conclusion. I have also sent a worksheet where the work needs to be done. Finally, please provide the completed worksheets in PDF format.

 Your submission should be at least two pages in length, not counting the title page and references (if used). References: No outside sources are required for the assignment. Details: This assignment has two parts. Both parts will be completed in the same attached Unit VII Homework Template. Part 1: Choose one of the three

The purpose of this assignment is to apply what you’ve learned about interpretive analysis and the visual arts by writing a reasonable and convincing INTERPRETIVE ANALYSIS of a work of visual art, practice using form and content evidence to support your reasonable and convincing interpretation by integrating the descriptions you wrote for a painting from

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.  This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade.  DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK, WHICH YOU WILL CITE USING MLA

Length: Your submission should be at least two (2) pages in length, not including the title page and references (if used). References: APA Style will not be required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required. Details: Using the Unit III Assignment Template, write a dialogue (short conversation) between two people. Keys to

Connecting standards to content is already a vital component of instruction. Building on this, we will further our expertise through the integration of critical thinking, reflection and metacognition, and provisions for equity in instruction. Choose 1 content standard that develops and promotes critical thinking. Write a minimum 525-word essay in

SHEILA- UP TO 3/2/2025- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 3 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** PART 1- Module 7 – DISCUSSION 7 Philosophy for Your Posterity If you

Click this link to watch the 2012 Cracknell production of Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. https://edu.digitaltheatreplus.com/content/productions/a-dolls-house-digital-theatreTo log in, click the blue “sign on” button enter the following: email/user: spcollege and password: GoTitans1927 GO OVER QUESTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA BEFORE WATCHING THE FILM! Grading Criteria  All your answers must be in your own words, accurately reflect

The clips to answer the questions is at the end of the instructions.  The purpose of this assignment is… to cultivate your attention to detail through the skill of careful watching.  to practice using the theater arts vocabulary that you’ve learned from the readings to describe and analyze a work theatrical performance Grading Criteria 

This assignment will be completed based off an assignment I did last week I’ve attached a photo of my work from the assignment and also the poem I did the assignment based off of you will need to read both the assignment that I completed and the poem to complete

SHEILA- UP TO 2/2/2025- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** PART 1- Module 3 – DISCUSSION 3 State which of the 3 scientific

Grading Criteria  Student name and date must be on paper or word document  Annotations must be handwritten Or can use draw tools in word All annotations and responses to the annotation questions must be in your own words, demonstrate your ability to correctly use and apply the module concepts, and

SHEILA- UP TO 1/19/25- ***** PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL WORK IS AUTHENTIC- DO NOT USE AI IT WILL BE SCANNED***** ****** THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS 2 PARTS / PLEASE LABEL EACH PART SEPARATELY WITH REFERENCES WHEN COMPLETED****** PART 1- Module 1 – DISCUSSION 1 The Role of Reason Today After

I just need you to write for my Legal and Ethical Issues in Healthcare Final Exam Assignment which consists of referring to book, textbook which I gave it in the applauded section and tools from the four topics which I would say as Savior, Siblings, Ethics and Humanitarian Aid, Who

Write a two to three-page paper (not including cover and reference pages) that responds to the following prompt: You are getting settled into your seat for a very long plane ride home. As you get to know the person next to you, you learn that they are a devout atheist